That implies there’s no actual difference between the theories other than the level of detail at which you analyze the evidence you have. I admit it’s entirely possible that EDT says you can’t look beyond the very most basic level of information, but that makes it sound like a straw man of a theory; any theory that obliges you to ignore evidence known to be relevant is hardly deserving of the name theory.
As I didn’t quite get to, that’s not my only objection. I need to finish writing this thing.
That implies there’s no actual difference between the theories other than the level of detail at which you analyze the evidence you have. I admit it’s entirely possible that EDT says you can’t look beyond the very most basic level of information, but that makes it sound like a straw man of a theory; any theory that obliges you to ignore evidence known to be relevant is hardly deserving of the name theory.
As I didn’t quite get to, that’s not my only objection. I need to finish writing this thing.